Choosing your divorce
attorney
If
you are involved in a divorce case in Oakland, Macomb, or Wayne county,
you owe it to yourself to contact us. We are aggressive yet
professionally courteous attorneys concentrating in divorce and family law.
Our office in Royal Oak, Michigan is easily reached from Oakland, Macomb
and Wayne counties. We handle new and post-judgment divorce cases in Oakland, Wayne, and
Macomb counties, and we represent out-of-state clients with Oakland,
Macomb, or Wayne county divorces.
Divorce is
dissolution of a valid marriage before the death of either spouse. It can
be contrasted with annulment, which is a declaration that a marriage is
void.
A divorce
must be certified by a court of law, as a legal action is needed to dissolve
the prior legal act of marriage. The terms of the divorce are also
determined by the court, though they may take into account prenuptial
agreements or postnuptial agreements, or simply ratify terms that the
spouses have agreed on privately. Often, however, the spouses disagree
about the terms of the divorce, which can lead to stressful (and expensive)
litigation. A less adversarial approach to divorce settlements has emerged
in recent years, known as mediation, an attempt to negotiate mutually
acceptable resolution to conflicts.
No Fault Divorce
Under
Michigan's no-fault divorce system, a marriage partner does not need to show
that the other marriage partner did or was at fault to obtain a divorce.
The only ground for divorce in Michigan is the
no-fault ground, i.e., "there has been a breakdown of the marriage
relationship to the extent that the objects of matrimony have been destroyed
and there remains no reasonable likelihood that the marriage can be
preserved"
MCL 552.6(1).
Although proof of fault is not necessary to obtain a divorce, fault can be
relevant in deciding custody, parenting time, property and debt division,
and spousal support.
In many
developed countries, divorce rates increased markedly during the twentieth
century. Among the nations in which divorce has become commonplace are the
United States, South Korea, and members of the European Union (with the
exception of Malta, where all civil marriages are for life, because civil
divorce is banned).
In the USA,
Canada, the United Kingdom, and some other developed Commonwealth countries,
this divorce boom developed in the last half of the twentieth century. In
addition, acceptance of the single-parent family has resulted in many women
deciding to have children outside marriage, as there is little remaining
social stigma attached to unwed mothers in some societies. Japan retains a
markedly lower divorce rate, though it has increased in recent years. The
subject of divorce as a social phenomenon is an important research topic in
sociology. In fact, the statistics of a survey conducted by Citibank on
divorce in the United States suggested that more than fifty percent of
divorced couples cited money problems as the cause of their divorce.
Statistics
In the
United States, in 2005 there were 7.5 new marriages per 1,000 people, and
3.6 divorces per 1,000, a ratio that has existed for many individual years
since the 1960s. As many statisticians have pointed out, it is very hard to
count the divorce rate, since it is hard to determine if a couple who
divorce and get back together in that same year should be considered a
divorce, so there is in fact no predictive relationship between the two
annual totals. This method does not take account of the length of marriage;
just the fact that a certain percentage of people were divorced and a
certain number of people are married, rendering the statistic problematic.
Nonetheless, the claim that "half of all marriages end in divorce" became
widely accepted in the US in the 1970s, on the basis of this statistic, and
has remained conventional wisdom. Pollster Lewis Harris in his 1987 book
"Inside America" wrote, "the idea that half of American marriages are doomed
is one of the most specious pieces of statistical nonsense ever perpetuated
in modern times."
To
establish an actual divorce rate requires tracking and analyzing significant
samples of actual marriages through decades, which is not an easy task.
Recent US scholarship based on such long-term tracking, reported for example
in the New York Times on April 19, 2005, has found that about 60% of all
marriages that result in divorce do so in the first decade, and more than
80% do so within the first 20 years; that the percentage of all marriages
that eventually end in divorce peaked in the United States at about 41%
around 1980, and has been slowly declining ever since, standing by 2002 at
around 31%. Some have attributed this decline to the popularity of
cohabitation without marriage. While in the 1960s and 1970s there was
little difference among socioeconomic groups in divorce rates, diverging
trends appeared starting around 1980 (e.g., the rate of divorce among
college graduates had by 2002 dropped to near 20%, roughly half that of
non-college graduates).
In the
decades following introduction of no-fault divorce laws, there was an
extraordinary increase in divorce rates, and more recent research has
clarified that US divorce rates had been on a gentle increase since the
1890s (with a short-term decline during the Great Depression and a spike
just after World War II). The long-term rate of increase steepened with the
advent of no-fault divorce laws in the late 1960s; the gradual decline
starting in the early 1980s has continued for a quarter-century thus far,
often attributed to increased social acceptability of co-habitation without
the benefit of marriage.
States in
the US handle billions of dollars in alimony and child support arrangements,
which commonly result from divorces. According to a 2003 US census report,
43.7% of custodial mothers and 56.2% of custodial fathers, are divorced or
separated. A 2005 Census Bureau Report found that in 2002, $40 billion had
been paid in support arrangements by 7.8 million payers, 84% of whom were
men. States also collected federal incentives to collect support payments,
with a potential incentive pool of up to $454 million in fiscal 2004.
The divorce
rate is generally low among Muslims, in comparison to other religious
groups. This may be due to the somewhat strict limitations generally placed
on divorce in Islam, as well as a very strong culturally based stigma
associated with it. However, at least in some Muslim populations, that rate
may be rising. For example: in 2004 in Singapore (which has an 18% Muslim
population) many feared that the divorce rate among Muslims had risen too
high: 9 out of every 1,000 marriages, a ratio 3 times higher than Malaysia,
and 5 times higher than Indonesia.
Causes
An annual
study in the UK by management consultants Grant Thornton estimates the main
causes of divorce based on surveys of matrimonial lawyers. The main
causes in 2004 (2003) were:
*
Extramarital affairs - 27% (29%)
* Family
strains - 18% (11%)
*
Emotional/physical abuse - 17% (10%)
* Mid-life
crisis - 13% (not in 2003 survey)
*
Addictions, e.g. alcoholism and gambling - 6% (5%)
*
Workaholism - 6% (5%)
According
to this survey, men engaged in extra-marital affairs in 75% (55%) of cases;
women in 25% (45%). In cases of family strain, women's families were the
primary source of strain in 78%, compared to 22% of men's families.
Emotional
and physical abuse were more evenly split, with women affected in 60% and
men in 40% of cases. In 70% of workaholism-related divorces it was men who
were the cause, and 30% women.
The 2004
survey found that 93% of divorce cases were petitioned by women, very few of
which were contested.
53% of
divorces were of marriages that had lasted 10 to 15 years, with 40% ending
after 5 to 10 years. The first 5 years are relatively divorce-free, and if a
marriage survives more than 20 years it is unlikely to end in divorce.
Regarding
divorce settlements, as defined by this survey women obtained a better or
considerably better settlement than men in 60% of cases. In 30% of cases the
assets were split 50-50, and in only 10% of cases did men achieve better
settlements (down from 24% the previous year). The 2004 report concluded
that campaigns like that of Fathers 4 Justice must succeed in increasing the
percentage of shared residence orders, in order for more equitable financial
divisions to become the norm.
Who Initiates Divorce?
The
National Center for Health Statistics reports that from 1975 to 1988 in the
US, in families with children present, wives file for divorce in
approximately two-thirds of cases. In 1975, 71.4% of the cases were filed
by women, and in 1988, 65% were filed by women.
According
to a study published in the American Law and Economics Review, women
currently file slightly more than two-thirds of divorce cases in the US.
There is some variation among states, and the numbers have also varied over
time, with about 60% of filings by women in most of the 19th century, and
over 70% by women in some states just after no-fault divorce was introduced,
according to the paper. Evidence is given that among college-educated
couples, the divorce filing rate by women approaches 90%.
In their
study titled "Child Custody Policies and Divorce Rates in the US," Kuhn and
Guidubaldi find it reasonable to conclude that women anticipate advantages
to being single, rather than remaining married.
When women
anticipate a clear gender bias in the courts regarding custody, they expect
to be the primary residential parent for the children and the resulting
financial child support, maintaining the marital residence, receiving half
of all marital property, and gaining total freedom to establish new social
relationships. In their detailed analysis of divorce rates, Khun and
Guidubaldi conclude that acceptance of joint physical custody may reduce
divorce. States whose family law policies, statutes, or judicial practice
encourage joint custody have shown a greater decline in their divorce rates
than those that favor sole
custody.
This article
is licensed under the
GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
Wikipedia article "Divorce".
|